Goodlatte criticizes, maintains status quo

Brent Finnegan -- February 17th, 2007

Although seventeen House Republicans joined 229 Democrats in voting for the “nonbinding resolution” — written by Democrats essentially to tell Bush that his troop surge is a stupid idea, and that it’s time to cut back on the troops in Iraq — Bob Goodlatte, “our” representative in the House, did not join the Republicans and Democrats supporting the resolution. He voted no, saying that the resolution “amounts to nothing more than a vote to maintain the status quo in Iraq.”

How does he figure that the resolution “maintains the status quo” when it clearly states that we need to be handing things over to the Iraqi government? The troop surge is the status quo.

And apparently, mentioning that Bush’s plan would likely have local consequences is “taking advantage” of a local family’s grief, so I won’t do that here.

-finnegan

4 Responses to “Goodlatte criticizes, maintains status quo”

  1. kai says:

    Goodlatte’s Comments:

    Mr. SAXTON. Madam Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Roanoke, VA (Mr. Goodlatte).

    Mr. GOODLATTE. Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition to the nonbinding resolution being offered by the majority which, despite the rhetoric, amounts to nothing more than a vote to maintain the status quo in Iraq.

    This resolution offers no change from the recent course of events in Iraq. It does not take into consideration the recommendations of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group. It does not require the Iraqi people and their elected leaders to step up and take responsibility for their own future. It certainly does not set any benchmark that must be met by the Iraqis. Most importantly, passage of this nonbinding resolution does not protect the funding of our troops in Iraq and, according to many Democrats, it is likely the first step in cutting off that funding altogether.

    Madam Speaker, we have spent 3 days debating a resolution that does nothing more than serve as a vote of no confidence in the brave men and women who are fighting for freedom and democracy in Iraq. Not only is this resolution discouraging to our commanders and forces, it will fuel the efforts of our enemies who are determined to spread terror and suppress freedom.

    Despite numerous attacks by terrorists on U.S. military and diplomatic targets throughout the 1990s, Americans on September 11, 2001 awoke to the painful realization that we are engaged in a long-term global war with terrorists, an international campaign to combat an ideology that spreads hate and destruction.

    Iraq is now the central front in this global war. Success in bringing about a stable and democratic Iraq in the heart of the Middle East is a goal that I believe we all share.

    While the difficulties cannot be minimized, neither can the consequences of failure and withdrawal. If we fail, the resources now devoted by terrorist organizations and nations sponsoring terrorism in Iraq will be turned to spreading terror around the globe including, again, on American soil. Do not embolden them with this resolution.

    The United States and our allies, in fact, all freedom-loving peoples, need to support the popularly elected Iraqi Government in establishing control over their country and providing a stable environment for the Iraqi people and our troops as they assist in this process. Together, we have made significant progress, despite numerous obstacles.

    Iraqis made history when they turned out in record numbers, despite increased violence, to vote in the first free elections in over 50 years. Millions of Iraqis waved their purple-tipped fingers with pride as they came out of the voting stations, a message to the world that they chose freedom.

    The President is the Commander in Chief and has the authority to make decisions about the best way to accomplish our goals in Iraq. He has initiated changes to our course in Iraq.

    However, today we will not be voting for change. We will not be voting for a comprehensive review of our strategy in Iraq. It is too bad that when we all have concerns about how best to achieve success in Iraq, the Democratic leadership has brought this polarizing and political resolution to the floor to divide us, rather than unite us, on the most serious question facing the country today.

    For this reason, I urge my colleagues to vote against this nonbinding resolution, which lacks any substance. I remind my colleagues that a “no” vote on this resolution is certainly not a rubber stamp for the President’s troop surge.

    While I continue to support the mission in Iraq, I think it is clear that the administration’s efforts to achieve the mission have not been flawless. But a vote against this resolution is a clear vote to support our commanders and troops and all those who have lost their lives spreading freedom to the people of Iraq.

    I believe that more should be done to press the now established Iraqi Government and U.S.-trained Iraqi military to take the lead. I believe more can be done on the diplomatic front to engage the countries of the Middle East to help.

    But unfortunately, no such resolution offering concrete evidence has been allowed, and this hollow process has resulted in a hollow resolution.

    I urge my colleagues to vote “no.”

    from:
    http://www.truemajorityaction.org/iraqdebate/search_doc.php?mainframe=http://www.truemajorityaction.org/iraqdebate/docs/iraq_daythree.html&findthis=GOODLATTE

  2. ktr001 says:

    Though it pains me to agree with Bob Goodlatte’s philosophy, I do. The resolution is maintaining the status quo in Iraq because it’s not actually, physically doing anything. The resolution clearly states that Congress first supports our troops there now and their efforts, and that it does not agree with Bush’s plans of escalation. Great. A lot of people don’t agree with Bush. So, what are we going to do about it?

    Also, Democratic leadership has already said it WILL NOT cut funding for troops already in Iraq, which, to me, implies scaling back is not even in the thought process right now.

    Stopping Bush’s plan for escalation is indeed a positive step for this situation, but to stop escalation and develop a plan to scale back our military presence, Congress needs to hit Bush where it hurts….in the purse.

  3. finnegan says:

    If they vote to cut funding outright, it will surely be misconstrued as a move “against the troops,” not against Bush. But they need to go ahead and do it.

    I agree that the Dems just need to grow a pair and that a stronger resolution is needed here, but I’ll still take this over no action against the surge.

  4. zen says:

    It’s been amazing to watch and listen to the republicans speak against this resolution. Being “non-binding” seems the safest, most opportune moment to be honest and admit that we are trending downward, and have been for years. It’s time to come clean about a realistic interpretation of “status quo.” A “surge” of adding a few more troops hasn’t worked before—what reason is there to think it will now?

    I would like to see more legislative bite to come. But it was also my hope that this “non-binding” resolution would be a clarion call of the American people to the hardheads that continue to ignore us. It would well for us all to realize the local, personal consequences of loss and sacrifice that this surge will bring.

Reader Tweets

Latest Flickr photos in the hburgnews Flickr pool
Announcements & Press Releases
  • Friendly City Grand Opening Set for July 9

    Friendly City Food Co-Op, Harrisonburg’s consumer-owned grocery, invites the community to come see its new destination for natural, organic and locally-produced products at the store’s grand opening 11 a.m.-5 p.m. July 9 at 150 East Wolfe Street.

  • Friendly City Becomes Member of National Cooperative Grocers Association

    HARRISONBURG, VA — Friendly City Food Co-op, slated to open this month in Harrisonburg, Va., has become the newest member of the National Cooperative Grocers Association (NCGA), a business services cooperative serving 120 consumer-owned food co-ops nationwide.

  • Harrisonburg Recognized as a Bike Friendly Community

    May 2: Harrisonburg was honored when the League of American Bicyclists announced the latest round of Bicycle Friendly Community (BFC) designations over the weekend to kick off May as National Bike Month.